The Second Amendment: Firearms in the U.S. | History
The Second Amendment: Firearms in the U.S. | History
How did the right “to keep and bear arms” become a part of the U.S. Constition? How have ideas about this right and its protections changed over time?
Subscribe for more HISTORY:
http://histv.co/SubscribeHistoryYT
Newsletter: https://www.history.com/newsletter
Website – http://www.history.com
/posts
Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/History
Twitter – https://twitter.com/history
HISTORY Topical Video
Season 1
Episode 1
Whether you’re looking for more on American Revolution battles, WWII generals, architectural wonders, secrets of the ancient world, U.S. presidents, Civil War leaders, famous explorers or the stories behind your favorite holidays.
HISTORY®, now reaching more than 98 million homes, is the leading destination for award-winning original series and specials that connect viewers with history in an informative, immersive, and entertaining manner across all platforms. The network’s all-original programming slate features a roster of hit series, epic miniseries, and scripted event programming. Visit us at HISTORY.com for more info.
You are being bamboozled, hoodwinked, Just flat out lied too and manipulated by anti-gun prohibitionist . The bill of rights was not given to the people by the federal government. The bill of rights is not a bill of privileges or suggestions, in which the federal government has the authority to control, regulate or take away. The bill of rights, is your (Undeniable rights); given to you by the people for the people. The federal government has NO authority in regulating your rights or denying you of your rights. The federal government has been in violation of the constitution and bill of rights for decades.
People, so called (Scholars) always skip the part of the sentence (The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed). Not the militia, the (People).
The constitution is referred to as a living document, meaning it evolves as does time. The federal government doesn’t have a monopoly on force, we are not limited to muskets as some anti-gun prohibitionist would have you believe either. As a matter of fact the document doesn’t state any limits on force. Anti-gun prohibitionist have been manipulating Americans with lies for far to long, enough is enough.
The constitution states (We the People) in the title, not we the federal government, not we the president. The people are in charge of the country not one man, not one group, or institution.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Where’s it say felons are not people?
Too many half-truths and falshoods in this video.
Due to the comments… this is a bad video for homework?
DROINS FLY 🪰 UNDER 400 Feet On My Ranch Will Be Tresspasion No Traping Or Views of My Wife or Little girl playing Dress Up Cameras Night 🤔 Vision Arr Well Come No Tresspasion Posted Property Means Keep Out Shot 5 x5 Bucket s 1 Night
The right to keep and bear arms in the USA is profitable for the stock market. Capitalist propaganda fuels the production of arms; not self defense. The 2nd amendment does not include the right to produce for sale fire arms or ammunition.
The 2nd amendment shall not be infringed and it was written in the constitution signed and sealed
Has The History Channel gone liberal now lol they sound pretty bias
2A all the way!!
the federalists were the decentralized ones you got it backwards
Unless you’re willing to agree that everyone should have a nuke for whenever they want to ‘stand their ground’, then you’re willing to admit there are and should be limitless controls for the ‘right to bear arms’.
Hilarious that they want to cite power hungry federalist like Hamilton in regards to the second amendment. But don’t cite him when he and many federalist argued that the bill of rights should not exist. Lmao. “Great”mind of Hamilton.
An outdated amendment made in the times of muskets that could shoot a lead ball around 2 shots a minute, not the army style assault weapons that kids of just 18 can legally own today in the US. And people should ask themselves as to why the US is the only western country in the world where so many people ( including little kids ) are being shot by guns !! As to the idea of modern day militias being formed to attack the American Armed forces, just crazy talk.
A wholly unnecessary amendment for the present times. Most democracies don’t have anything like this amendment and they are doing just fine with less gun violence. It should be scrapped through a plebiscite. The constitution is man-made and not the word of God. So the majority of the people should be able to change it anytime it wants to do that. Stop fetishizing 18th century texts in their entirety without proper present-day context.
Doesn’t say anything about ammo. Let them buy whatever guns they want but restrict the ammo to 30 rounds a year.
The ability to form an armed militia is a reason the citizens should be armed, but it is not the only reason as has been argued by some. It is a right of the PEOPLE that shall not be infringed, and is a prohibition placed on the government in the same way that the First Amendment prohibits Congress from passing a law establishing a religion.
There are as many historical quotes arguing against the individual right as there are arguing for it. This piece picks and chooses.
Everything goes back to slavery. All of our rights somehow came out of slavery it seems like. Much credit to those slaves who endured so much, they helped build this country in so many ways. They are not African Americans they are simply Americans.
2nd amendment applied to their immigrant citizens only,Native Americans were disarmed and forcefully moved in their westward GENOCIDE movement and put on reservations,it wasnt until 1924 when INDIGENOUS people were accepted as citizens. (HISTORY)
It’s amazing how you anti-2 Amendment people forget about how the Roof-Koreans, in 1992 , in Los Angeles used their 2nd Amendment Individual Rights to protect themselves and their property from looters because there were no response from police during the LA Roits!
This is utter BS.
The purpose of 2a was to RESTRICT FEDERAL POWER.
The whole Bill of Rights are redundancy and maybe some further clarification, but the main purpose was RESTRICTING FEDERAL POWER.
It was redundancy because even without the Bill of Rights.. everyone still had all of those rights, and the federal government never had any power granted to it to infringe on any rights of the people.
2a absolutely 100%, clearly, without a doubt protected an individual right with the words "the Right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed".
Their mention of Heller being the first SC ruling to say it was an individual Right is very dishonest.
Heller was the 4th ruling in American history on 2a.
Cruikshank ruled on the individual right, but said that 2a was only written to restrict federal power, so they had no jurisdiction over this case.. this was 1876, before incorporation of our Bill or rights, so in this ruling they also said the same about the right to assemble.
Presser v Illinois (1884) just basically ruled the same as Cruikshank but this time it was about the militia.
Miller (1939) Was a terrible ruling that should just be thrown out. Hopefully soon it will be overruled.
Miller died before the hearing and had no representation. US v Miller was decided by the SC and a bunch of US attorneys…
And even THEN it did NOT imply that there wasn’t an individual right, in fact it did the opposite. That there was an individual Right.
Nice try "History Channel" but you can’t lie to me.
If its about the militia having the right, why did the constitution state the "PEOPLE" have the right. That either means the people are the milita or that the militia is the armed forces and people have a right to bear arms because of the potential threat of the government led militia carrying out tyrnanny.
if government takes weapons from people your country will become a craphole like Russia. in Russia people are forbidden to own guns so pootin and his cronies murder everyone they want and shamelessly rob taxpayers of all money.
people owning guns = democracy.
“Shall not be infringed” literally means no gun laws can be made against our 2A. 🇺🇸
Very very leading piece…. gun owners are synonymous with slave owners…. is what they are wongly trying to say
2nd ammendment. y? to stop us at capitol? its not that u need more guns its abolish second amendment so they r not protected. north america always pulls AMERICA to the ground with they schemes. wake up. u dont need it. new age. 2nd amendment was so ppl could correct the government.
This entire presentation is rather humorous, now that NYSRPA v. Bruen is in the books….
Of course, I guess I wouldn’t expect much better from anyone in media….
I’m so thankful we have ppl who volunteer to serve In the military. That means they have to protect the second amendment. It’s the law. If they didn’t agree with it then why would they volunteer to defend it?
False statements….. @2:40 …the 2nd Amendment is for all citizens ….the unorganized militia is all able bodied men from age 18 to 40.
So basically the supreme court ruled that Washington d.c ( which is not a state part of the u.s.a ) that the d.c district of Columbia has to follow united States laws even though it’s a foreign country
The 2nd amendment was written for communist joe biden he’ll arm Taliban terrorists but wants our guns not
Having a law that states you can keep guns is stupid, America is stupid LMAO
"…the right of the PEOPLE o keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Hmm…interesting origins of the 2nd Amendment. It certainly sounds like these current shootings using semi-automatic firearms will never cease unless that type of weapon is banned, which won’t happen unless they are seen less as essential to gun owners and more as weapons of mass destruction. Yeah, I mean that too.
All debates aside, there has been hundreds of people of all ages shot using those guns with the ability to fire quickly multiple times.
The Second Amendment is premised on a well-regulated militia. An absolute requirement of such a militia is that its weapons are registered and its members subject to training and discipline. We’re way behind on that.
what good is it if they can’t even terminate michael myers
The entire gun rights argument is based on -the belief that Madison fieared an authoritarian government. No, he believed the government he had designed would prevent that. He feared a standing army and felt a militia was the only way to protect the country from external enemies. His original draft shows that clearly!
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, a well-armed and well-regulated militia being the best security of a free country; but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.”
It was Patrick Henry, the largest slave holder in Virginia who forced the change. Henry feared that a future abolitionist President could call the militia out of state and endanger the slave states from a slave uprising because the militias in the slave states were also the slave patrols.
Thus the wording that was finally approved and included in the Constitution.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Pretty sure there is not much room to “misinterpret “the second amendment. It’s pretty clear that the right should not be infringed. I think what you meant to say was there’s been a lot of “interpretations” so they can still deny people their Second Amendment right, while subsequently brainwashing mass amount of the public to (mis)believe, that people who legally hold guns in line with their second amendment right are the ones that are responsible for the rising gun violence. That is the misinformation.
40 mass shootings in January 2023 alone thus far… But yeah keep believing that more background checks are going to solve the problem. Smh
There is a military on Earth that’s greater than any military that has ever been assembled. Better than the Roman empire. Better than the Soviet Union. Better than the military of China. And if they decided to take over the world, in order to make it better, they could very easily. They are 40 million Americans, who own 400 million guns. If they stood together, no military could defeat them.
B. Julian Kohl
Gun control isnt about guns, its about control and power, the elite have guns and hold power while the average civilians here in belgium are fling unarmed and have to rely on the law enforcement and military for protection, which sucks
The constitution also guaranteed the right to own slaves also. Times change the 2nd. Amendment says a well trained militia a citizen soldier not every citizen. They can ban your assault weapon just like a grenade or a bazooka they are both arms too but you can’t buy or own them.
I highly doubt it was only for a militia, you have context? letters from the founder saying this maybe?
2nd ammendment. y? to stop us at capitol? its not that u need more guns its abolish second amendment so they r not protected. north america always pulls AMERICA to the ground with they schemes. wake up. u dont need it. new age. 2nd amendment was so ppl could correct the government.
The government wants to take our guns. What do you think there going to do then 🤔
Name one example of a gun being the root cause of violence. HInt :you can’t.
You folks don’t seem to mind the fact that “red states” try very hard to restrict the right of people to vote.
I’d like to make that 2nd amendment scroll into toilet paper.
The History channel is so biased toward the left.
The Bill of Rights have been violated for decades now. Cruel and Unusual punishment, excessive fines. Freedom of religion and now more recently the right to keep and bear arms. Government needs a wake up call. This is America